Wednesday 05 Aug 2020 | 06:20 | SYDNEY
What's happening on

About the project

The Australia-Papua New Guinea Network is an initiative to build stronger people-to-people and foster links between business in Australia and Papua New Guinea.

Latest publications

Developing PNG’s cybercrime policy: Local contexts, global best practice

With Papua New Guinea's national elections just over three months away, attention has turned to the government's legislative record. Last August the Papua New Guinean government passed the Cybercrime Act into law (despite the act being passed into law six months ago, it is not yet available for the public to read on the government’s website; a draft copy circulated in early last year can be found here). This act has had and will have major ramifications for the role the internet plays in PNG society.

With information becoming an increasingly valuable commodity, and the rising importance of network security and data integrity, it's positive to see cyber security is being taken seriously in PNG. Coincidentally, however, the law was introduced at a time when the government faced significant criticism online, raising concerns the act is simply government censorship under the pretence of security.

The Council of Europe's Convention on Cybercrime (ratified by 52 countries, and also known as the Budapest Convention) describes cybercrime as offences relating to computer-related data, fraud and network security, as well as copyright infringement. Cybercrime legislation and policy are established to protect citizens from such crimes and prosecute offenders, as well as to regulate and promote positive growth within the ICT sector. It is important for PNG to take local contexts into account alongside global standards, such as the Budapest Convention, as cybercrime offences often span both local and international jurisdictions. This includes best practice in both the policies and processes for drafting and enacting cybercrime legislation.

The fact that the PNG government has recognised the importance of cybersecurity is significant, given that cybercrime legislation is fairly patchy within the Pacific region. The draft bill outlines offences and penalties relating to data and network security, including cybercrime offences as recognised by the Budapest Convention such as unauthorised access, data and system interference. The policy also covers traditional offences committed via computer, such as electronic fraud and forgery (likewise recognised in the Budapest convention). This is relatively common practice; more and more personal information is held and transactions are carried out via electronic means. This particular element of cyber legislation could be criticised on the grounds that fraud and forgery are already crimes regardless of whether they are carried out online or not – while keeping concerns over potentially creating another level of bureaucratic legality in mind, the components of the legislation relating to data and network security are all quite reasonable.

It is when the draft legislation deals with content-related offences that lines become more blurred and concerns about censorship and restrictions on freedom of expression arise. Articles which may be interpreted as suppressive include 'offensive publications' and 'defamatory publications', among others. The Act thus may deter online dissent to government action, a view aired by prominent blogger Martyn Namarong (who has since shut down his blog in protest). An online defamatory publication, which the legislation defines as using an electronic system to intentionally make publicly available material that may harm the reputation of another person, could potentially land someone in prison for decades, if the punishments prescribed in the draft bill remain intact in the final legislation.

However, Zinia Dawidi, a lawyer who helped draft the document, has stated these were ceiling penalties and that the actual penalty applied could range from zero to a maximum of the figures stated. It is unclear how this policy will apply to whistle-blowers or those that reveal confidential yet criminally compromising documents. One other article that stands out refers to cyber unrest, which the bill defines as the use of electronic media to incite any form of unrest and various other criminal actions defined in PNG's criminal code act. More clarity should be provided around what sort of cases can and cannot be tried under these articles, and emphasis placed on the protection of the right to freedom of speech and peaceful protest.

The other issue that has drawn criticism from domestic commentators is the process with which the act was drafted and passed, and in particular the lack of emphasis on consultation and public awareness. There has been much concern about the timing of the bill being passed into law – the months preceding its passing saw widespread protests organised through social media against the government, culminating in a shooting at the University of Papua New Guinea in June.

However, though the bill was not passed until August last year, the policy was launched in October 2015. The International Telecommunication Union also notes that there was a public consultation held in Port Moresby in December 2012 regarding cybercrime policy upon request from the government. There is little else to suggest a thorough consultation and public awareness campaign, but it clearly has been discussed for some time. Broader community consultation would strengthen PNG's cybersecurity strategy.

Despite the passing of this new legislation, PNG faces considerable challenges with regards to its cyber maturity, as reflected in its rankings in the Australian Strategic Policy Institute's 2016 report on 'cyber maturity' in the Asia-Pacific. The same report notes that 'countries with lower cyber maturity continue to approach cybercrime as a means through which to implement strong online censorship'.

Taking the initiative to legislate against cybercrime is an important first step from the PNG government. However, there are areas where PNG can strengthen its approach to cybersecurity. With persistent concerns about censorship hovering over the policy, further definition around certain articles is needed to prevent exploitation and cyber censorship. This should be done in consultation with stakeholders from business, civil society and academia and involve international organisations that work towards enhancing global cooperation on cybersecurity. Harmonisation and effective implementation of cyber legislation will help protect citizens against cybercrime and contribute to stability and growth in a changing global economy.

Pacific links: Climate change, China in PNG, Fiji self-censors and more

By Harriet Smith, an intern with the Lowy Institute's Melanesia Program.

Main photo: Pexels/8551 images CCO Public Domain

Pacific Island links: 2017 predictions, PNG uni places, internet cables and more

Pacific Island links: Tourism in PNG, gender-based violence, bans on home births, and more

 

Photo: Flickr/Taro Taylor

The Embarrassed Colonialist

Forty years after independence, Papua New Guinea is the largest single recipient of aid from Australia. Yet Australians seem to be largely ambivalent about the country. Few Australians know the history of our colonial rule in PNG and our ties to the country are being forgotten.

 

 

2015 Australia-Papua New Guinea Emerging Leaders Dialogue: Outcomes Report

In this Report, the Lowy Institute’s Melanesia team summarises the outcomes of the third annual Australia-Papua New Guinea Emerging Leaders Dialogue. The Dialogue assembled a group of dynamic young leaders from diverse fields in both countries. Discussion focused on redefining employment, sustaining rural communities, engaging Asia, and gender inequality. The young leaders used the Dialogue to make new professional connections and are already collaborating to enhance existing initiatives that prove the enduring value of people-to-people relations between Papua New Guinea and Australia.

Papua New Guinea in 2015: at a crossroads and beyond

2015 is a significant year for Papua New Guinea.  The country will mark 40 years of independence from Australia, host the Pacific Islands Forum leaders’ meeting and the Pacific Games.  The Papua New Guinea economy will record the highest GDP growth rate in the world in 2015 but will also formally fail to meet any of the United Nations’ Millennium Development Goals in their deadline year.

The Papua New Guinea government has introduced tuition fee free education and free healthcare but faces major challenges in improving the living standards of its population of over seven million people.  The resources boom has helped drive investment in infrastructure but catering for the nation’s growing youth bulge is proving a particularly difficult policy problem.  Changes to the way different levels of government are being administered could improve service delivery in rural areas but have the potential to undermine national development planning.  The next generation of leaders will face an even more complex set of challenges. 

The Papua New Guinea economy is reliant on foreign investment in the resources sector and therefore highly exposed to the global economy.  This was to Papua New Guinea’s advantage while demand for its resources and global commodity prices were high during the resources boom. But even with fourteen years of successive GDP growth, it has proved difficult to spread the benefits of the boom.  A major challenge for the next generation of leaders in Papua New Guinea will be to better manage the nation’s wealth and effectively implement policies and programs that will result in improved living standards for all Papua New Guineans.

These were among the key conclusions reached by thirty participants at a Roundtable meeting, Papua New Guinea in 2015 – At a crossroads and beyond, convened by the Lowy Institute for International Policy on 28 April 2015.

Participants included representatives from business, government, civil society, academia and the media –  from Australia and from Papua New Guinea.  Discussion focused on challenges for the next generation of leaders in Papua New Guinea and future directions for Australia-Papua New Guinea relations.

Pages