PCA South China Sea ruling

The Diego Garcia dispute hits cyberspace

James Mortensen , Samuel Bashfield

As internet domains go, .io is a money spinner. Would a change to the “British Indian Ocean Territory” cancel an asset?

A “No-First-Use” doctrine would undermine American nuclear deterrence

Andrew O'Neil , Stephan Frühling

And Australia should make clear to the Biden administration any such commitment is not in the interests of allies.

view

DFAT on China and Timor-Leste: No 'two-step' but one considered approach

Dr Michael Leach makes a number of inaccurate claims in his Interpreter post: 'The PCA ruling, Australia and Timor-Leste'. Dr Leach asserts Australia is engaged in a ‘two-step’ in its approach to international law with China and Timor-Leste. He also appears to accept a premise of Australia’s

By Allaster Cox

view

More heat than light in Australian FONOPs debate

Australia’s febrile domestic politics produced another petty point-scoring moment after the shadow defence minister, Senator Stephen Conroy, sought political mileage from last Tuesday’s historic South China Sea arbitration. Senator Conroy criticised the government for not sanctioning

By Greg Raymond

view

South China Sea: A course-correction needed

Tuesday's South China Sea adjudication demonstrates that the UNCLOS framework is totally unsuited to sorting out the complex conflicting claims in the South China Sea in a way that the relevant parties will accept. By effectively announcing the Philippines as winner and China as loser, the tribunal'

By Stephen Grenville

view

Advantage Vietnam: The PCA ruling impact on Hanoi-Beijing relations

China and Vietnam have reacted very differently to the Permanent Court of Arbitration ruling on the South China Sea. While China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs has declared the PCA award should be 'null and void', in Hanoi it was welcomed. The PCA ruling will give the Vietnamese government extra

By Santiago Saez Moreno

view

The bolt from The Hague

Yesterday’s unanimous Award by the five-member tribunal of the Permanent Court of Arbitration was three years in the making, but for the Philippines it was worth the wait. Of the 15 cases submitted by the Philippines in its dispute over China’s excessive maritime claims in the South China Sea

By Euan Graham

Lowy Institute

PO Box H-159
Australia Square NSW 1215, Australia
+61 2 8238 9000
reception@lowyinstitute.org

Media Enquiries

Erin Bassett
+61 2 8238 9035
+61 (0)409 461 795

The Diego Garcia dispute hits cyberspace

A “No-First-Use” doctrine would undermine American nuclear deterrence

Where in the world is Jack Ma?

Search

Institute - Top Menu

PCA South China Sea ruling

DFAT on China and Timor-Leste: No 'two-step' but one considered approach

More heat than light in Australian FONOPs debate

South China Sea: A course-correction needed

Advantage Vietnam: The PCA ruling impact on Hanoi-Beijing relations

The bolt from The Hague

Useful Links

Contact Us

Our Location