Thursday 20 Jul 2017 | 17:26 | SYDNEY
What's happening on

Photo: Flickr/Pieter van Marion


The vitality of the global trading system is crucial not only to Australia’s long-term economic outlook, but also the countries within our region. Access to global trade networks both for Australia and key emerging markets within the Indo-Pacific region are therefore of major interest to the International Economy Program at the Lowy Institute for International Policy.

Australia’s terms of trade have changed significantly in recent years. After reaching historic highs due to record export prices in Australia’s three major bulk commodities (iron ore , metallurgical coal and thermal coal), Australia’s terms of trade are projected to return to pre-boom levels over the next decade.  This readjustment will have a significant impact on the value of the Australian dollar, and will have a number of other effects on the real economy. 

Similarly, post the global financial crisis, the structure of international trade is undergoing a major transition. Despite the relative gains made from a multilateral trading system that centred around the World Trade Organization (WTO), the inability to conclude the Doha Development Agenda has seen a decline in enthusiasm for major multilateral rounds. In particular, the single undertaking agreement in the WTO (i.e. nothing is agreed until everything is agreed) has led many countries to pursue bilateral and mega-regional agreements (such as the Australia-Japan FTA, and the Transpacific Partnership or TPP).

The emergence of mega-regional agreements like the TPP will have significant ramifications for the future of the global trading system. Like the Transatlantic Trade Investment Partnership (TTIP), the TPP will see a collection of major economies authoring new standards and rules for trade. This could detract from the multilateral underpinnings of the WTO and the truly global trading network that had begun to emerge since the WTO was established in 1995. That neither TPP nor TTIP includes the poorest countries in the world, let alone China, raises further questions about the legitimacy, efficiency, and economic value of a shift away from true multilateralism.

What the Lowy Institute does

The Lowy Institute has approached current and future trends in the global trading system from several angles. In addition to the work on trade undertaken by the International Economy Program, the G20 Studies Centre has produced several outlooks and perspectives on the role of trade within global economic governance generally, and within the Group of Twenty process specifically. This has involved investigations into initiatives of the G20 on trade, such as the post-GFC ‘standstill’ agreement that prevented a return to 1930s-era trade protectionism that followed the Great Depression as well as how the G20 can value-add to establishing a more coherent global trading system, that ensures new initiatives such as the TPP and the TTIP make positive contributions to the future of international trade, rather than become vehicles for its disintegration.  This has become especially relevant after the conclusion of the Bali talks on trade facilitation, that represented the first agreement within the WTO, since its creation.

International trade, and governance of the global trading system, will continue to be an ongoing focus for the International Economy Program, as well as the G20 Studies Centre.

TPP: With one down, can 11 stand?

Reports of the death of the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) were exaggerated – or at least premature. Move over a TPP of 12 nations (TPP12) and make way for TPP11, the lower number reflecting the withdrawal of the US from the agreement. When President Trump withdrew the US from the TPP in

Lessons from India on migration’s role in trade policy

Prime Minister Turnbull yesterday carefully signalled a potential India-Australia Free Trade Agreement is not a priority for his government. This comes after the Abbott Government set a very public benchmark for concluding an India-Australia FTA by the end of 2015, an overly optimistic commitment

Why the TPP should be saved

Perhaps there is, as Ross Garnaut has argued, no silver lining to Donald Trump’s economics. But there may be a small silver lining to Trump’s rejection of the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) and his embrace of protectionist policies during the campaign. It depends if the response to these helps

Douglass North and the Trans-Pacific Partnership

Now that the terms of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) have been agreed, the participant countries have to decide whether to ratify the deal. In assessing the benefits, where might we turn for guidance on the economics? First thoughts might go to David Ricardo, father of one of the few ideas

TPP: Australia should bring in China and Indonesia

The negotiators have finally reached agreement on the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). The US Congress might yet be a stumbling block, but the many US interest groups which stand to benefit will influence that outcome. Other TPP countries have to get legislative approval too. Whatever the

TPP: Not worth the risk

After marathon talks, the Trans Pacific Partnership has been sealed. The stage is now set for some fantastic battles to get this through national legislatures. I'll leave it to others to count the numbers. I've written previously about my concerns regarding the TPP, and agreements like it. I won't