Rizieq has returned to Indonesia amid a weakening of Islamist politics. The Islamists became demoralised after their political patron, Prabowo Subianto, left the alliance to join the Joko Widodo administration as the Minister of Defence. Islamists have been laying low as they continue to be scrutinised for being critical of the government.
The return of Rizieq amounts to an effort to energise Islamist politics from this ill fortune. Executives at the Indonesian Council of Ulema (MUI), a quasi-state institution known for its conservative stance, believe that Rizieq, with his penchant for combative and sharp critiques of Joko Widodo, will be a potent political weapon for Islamists to challenge the current regime. An MUI executive, Anwar Abbas, argued that Rizieq is a phenomenal figure, with large numbers of loyal followers, with an unrivalled skill in delivering political jabs against the establishment in the country.
Some emerging political groups have invited Rizieq to establish political partnerships to broaden their constituencies in preparation for the 2024 elections. The Save Indonesia Coalition (KAMI), a sizable mass organisation made up of numerous prominent government critics including Islamists, claimed that they are ready to work together with Rizieq “to defend justice, truth and to fight oppression”. The Masyumi Party also asked Rizieq to join them, given their common political and ideological aspirations. The warm welcome shows that Islamists are hopeful with his return.
Yet other Islamist politicians, including from the more established political parties, such as the Prosperous Justice Party (PKS), only cautiously welcome Rizieq. These politicians understand that his influence has grown following Ahok’s blasphemy incident in 2017. While they seem favourable towards his return, the Islamist politicians remain at a distance with the firebrand cleric.
An executive of the Ummat Party stated that his party decided to launch the party’s logo in lieu of Rizieq’s arrival in Indonesia as it symbolises “the cleric’s struggle in fighting oppressive powers and establishing justice”. In a similar tone, the PKS president Ahmad Syaikhu urged the government to not criminalise Rizieq. These statements reflect a positive attitude from Islamist politicians towards Rizieq’s return. However, none of them has made concrete offers for political alliances with the cleric in order to achieve their common political objectives.
These Islamist politicians understand that there are risks in building formal political alliances with Rizieq or merging their organisations with Rizieq’s organization (FPI). Rizieq’s combative, divisive and uncompromising style could be a liability for them. While such tactics might be appeal to poor and uneducated urban Muslims, it will not impress broader constituencies, who are more comfortable with a more moderate tone of politics.
By associating with established Islamist parties, Rizieq might help to expand their political base, but his presence could inadvertently alienate existing constituencies.
A’an Suryana , Nur Syafiqah Mohd Taufek