Papua New Guinea, explained.
Australia needs to invest in its relationship with PNG
We cannot passively rely on our historic and geographic closeness. If we fail to advance our relations with PNG, other actors will overtake Australia.
Papua New Guinea, explained.
We cannot passively rely on our historic and geographic closeness. If we fail to advance our relations with PNG, other actors will overtake Australia.
Subscribe to The Informer for monthly expert analysis, and to Events for advance notice of visiting world leaders and distinguished guests.
You may unsubscribe from Lowy Institute newsletters at any time. For information on our privacy practices and how to unsubscribe, see our Privacy Policy.
Australia needs to invest in its relationship with PNGAustralia needs to invest in its relationship with PNG
Papua New Guinea is our nearest neighbour, yet few Australians have more than superficial knowledge of its culture and history. In a recent Lowy Institute poll, more Australians failed to identify the Prime Minister of Papua New Guinea than failed to identify Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Pope Francis, Angela Merkel and Vladimir Putin combined.
Australia was more cognisant of the South Pacific through the World War II and Cold War eras, when our relations in the region were driven by our security interests. That interest has shifted since the 1990s, with the Pacific coming to be seen as an 'arc of instability'. Another dominant and concurrent view frames the region as a burden to Australian taxpayers. These views do a disservice to the importance of the Pacific to Australia.
Australia’s deficit in understanding PNG is particularly surprising, given quite how close we are geographically. When you stand on the coastline of Saibai Island in the Torres Strait and look north, as I once did as minister for climate change, you can see Sigabaduru, PNG, across the water and appreciate that at our closest point, a mere 3.7km separates us. Papua New Guinean families regularly come across to Saibai by boat to sell their goods. This freedom of movement is enabled under special treaty arrangements, and as a result the communities in this region around our closest geographic point are an exception to the norm in our broader populations, and interact routinely as neighbours.
We share a history with PNG that comprises a colonial past, independence, and a special bond that reflects more than just our geographic proximity.
In a time of unprecedented global change, the preservation of peace and stability in our region is paramount. The security of PNG and the strength of our bilateral relations need to be core aspects of Australian foreign policy.
The list of immediate challenges facing PNG is lengthy: fiscal challenges, diversification of a resource-dependent export economy, corruption, good governance, performance against the Millennium Development Goals, and an increasing risk of non-traditional security threats.
At present, PNG’s revenue, when adjusted for inflation, is commensurate with 2006 levels. This means that in PNG’s resource-rich economy, the benefits of the Exxon-Mobil LNG project have been completely negated by falling global commodity prices.
In the meantime, despite the challenges, PNG’s view of itself and its place in the world is changing. In late October, when I visited PNG for the first time as shadow foreign minister, I spoke to leaders in Port Moresby about PNG’s role in the region. PNG will host APEC in 2018, and rightly sees itself as part of an 'Asian corridor', as well as a Pacific island.
What was also made clear to me through a visit to Hela Province, and through bilateral meetings, was that the Australia-PNG partnership is very important on both sides.
But I was also reminded that we cannot passively rely on our historic and geographic closeness. If we fail to advance our relations with PNG, other actors will overtake Australia. PNG is spoiled for choice when it comes to international partners and its own engagements with global interests. Australia cannot afford to be complacent when it comes to investing in a strong relationship with our nearest neighbour.
Because Australia’s place in PNG’s changing worldview is not assured, we face an ongoing challenge to strengthen our relations with PNG, both at a high level in terms of strategic interests, and at an on-the-ground level of investment by civil society and people on both sides of the bilateral relationship.
A bilateral relationship cannot rest on government alone, and it is the responsibility of Australian leadership to articulate to the public why Australia needs to better understand Melanesian culture. We should not just fund better expertise on Melanesia and PNG, we should ensure it is valued and appreciated in Australia.
We also must recognise and respond to PNG’s interests. Our bilateral relations cannot simply be a series of Australian requests, but rather must be robust and broad, and reflect a shared strategic agenda.
Projections suggest that by 2050, PNG will have a population of 30 million. By then, the scale of PNG, its system of government, its people, and its challenges will have been similarly magnified. The investment Australia makes today in PNG has returns not just in the present, but also for that projected future population of 30 million Papua New Guineans – for our own future and that of our shared region.
Penny Wong
About the author
Penny Wong
Senator the Hon Penny Wong is Foreign Minister of Australia.
Topics
The most-pressing world events explained by Lowy Institute experts and global contributors, in your inbox, every Thursday.
You may unsubscribe from The Interpreter at any time. For information on our privacy practices and how to unsubscribe, see our Privacy Policy.
