There are also challengers to Chinese aid from traditional donors and Pacific Islands. Countries such as the United States, Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom are ramping up their presence in the Pacific to counterbalance China’s influence. In Pacific Island countries, there are divided views on whether they should develop closer ties with China. Recent research finds that Pacific scholars, university students and non-government organisations have concerns about the debt risks, environmental impact and inadequate local benefits of Chinese aid projects. The majority of surveyed university students in Papua New Guinea and Fiji would oppose more Chinese aid to their countries if they became leaders in the future.
China has recently taken steps to increase its influence in the region. During his visit to the Pacific in May and June, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi announced that his country will deepen cooperation with Pacific Islands via six new platforms: agriculture, climate action, poverty reduction, disaster preparedness, emergency supplies and mushroom grass (juncao) technology. This, compared with the funding of infrastructure projects, provides an opportunity for China to deliver less costly aid projects featuring technical transfer and knowledge sharing. It will also have the potential to increase Chinese aid contractors’ engagement with local communities and improve China’s image as a donor that is devoting attention to both elites and ordinary people in the Pacific.
Chinese provinces and cities are also looking for opportunities to enrich the bilateral relations between China and Pacific Islands. For example, Shandong and Fujian established sister province relations with the Western Province and Isabel Province in Solomon Islands in July 2021 and April 2022. In a similar move, Liaocheng (which hosts a Pacific Research Centre and the China–Pacific Cooperation Centre on Climate Change) and Qingdao in Shandong recently signed protocols with Vava‘u in Tonga and Tainainano in Kiribati to form sister city relations. In March 2022, Guizhou Province dispatched China’s first ever medical team to Solomon Islands. And in the same month, 80 students from the Islands set off for vocational and technical training in China as part of an education scholarship program for Pacific students with the Tianjin Municipality. In support of the central government’s official relations with the Pacific Islands, these Chinese local governments have also provided aid including machinery and Covid-related medical supplies to their Pacific counterparts. Their role in China’s diplomacy is expected to grow in the future.
China is also making efforts to tackle the aid transparency issue, which research suggests is damaging Beijing’s overseas image as a major donor. In January 2022, the China International Development Cooperation Agency (CIDCA) organised online training of Chinese companies and social organisations on the use of an aid reporting portal. However, it is likely that this portal was designed to facilitate domestic coordination between CIDCA and Chinese aid contractors. There are no signs that China will release more detailed aid data to the public at home or in other countries. As a result, speculations and suspicions about Chinese aid in the Pacific are expected to persist.
Geostrategic competition between China and traditional powers is escalating in the Pacific, as is the diplomatic tug-of-war between China and Taiwan. In this context, it’s little wonder that the Chinese government continues to provide substantial assistance to Pacific Island countries. So far, China has pledged 2500 government scholarships and 3000 short-term professional training slots to Pacific candidates between 2020 and 2025. The materialisation of these commitments and their impact on China–Pacific Islands relations deserves attention.