But it is the increasingly complicated Libyan conflict and a separate but related dispute over Eastern Mediterranean gas reserves that are exacerbating tensions. France, a key military member of NATO, along with a number of odd bedfellows such as Russia and the UAE, has been backing the opposition forces of General Khalifa Haftar, while Turkey is backing the UN-recognised Government of National Accord (GNA). Turkey has allegedly been providing the GNA forces with Syrian mercenaries as part of its Libyan adventure. And Russian mercenaries from the Wagner Group have also reportedly been deployed to support Haftar’s forces. With the GNA now in the ascendancy, the conflict threatens to become even more complicated with the Egyptian parliament’s approval last week to deploy troops outside the country to secure its western border if necessary.
Turkey also used its alliance with the GNA to sign a maritime boundary MOU in November 2019 that has been labelled “illegal” and “illogical” and caused consternation in Egypt, Greece, Israel and Lebanon. Turkey is seen as a spoiler by these other countries in the rush to develop the gas-rich reserves in the eastern Mediterranean, using its control of the (not internationally recognised) Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus and the MOU as justification for its actions.
Turkey’s actions have consequently put it at odds with other NATO partners – France in particular. Tensions between France and Turkey have been escalating for months and in January this year France promised naval support to help Greece in a standoff with Turkey in the Eastern Mediterranean. But last month, the most serious incident between the two countries occurred as a French vessel that was part of a NATO maritime mission in the Mediterranean sought to search a Tanzanian-registered vessel it believed was smuggling arms to Libya. It was being escorted by Turkish naval vessels, which declared the ship was carrying humanitarian supplies, and which the French claimed aggressively warned off its vessel. Public insults have been exchanged and a NATO investigation conducted, the results of which haven’t been released.
Erdogan’s ultra-nationalist rhetoric and actions have won him few friends, and the recent decision to reopen Istanbul’s Hagia Sophia as a mosque after more than 80 years as a museum even caused the Pope to say that he was “deeply pained” by the move. But Erdogan is at heart and instinct a domestic politician and cares little for what other countries or leaders think. He is also a foreign policy opportunist, however, and given a distracted and ineffective administration in Washington, he has sought to advance Turkey’s regional interests with little regard for his NATO partners, figuring that they need him more than he needs them. But he should expect more pushback from a Biden administration, which would be instinctively multilateralist and more willing to rebuff Ankara’s unilateralist foreign policies.
As vice president, Biden experienced Erdogan’s leadership style, including being snubbed by the president when he visited Turkey in 2016. But in a tweet last year, Biden criticised Trump’s kid-glove approach to Turkish intervention in Syria:
First Trump gave a green light to Erdogan to ethnically cleanse Kurds who helped us defeat ISIS. Now he welcomes Erdogan with open arms and sweetheart deals. It’s hard to avoid the conclusion that, once again, Trump’s personal interests, not US interests, are driving his policy.
— Joe Biden (@JoeBiden) November 13, 2019
If tweets are any indication of political intent – and these days they appear to be the preferred means to announce policy – then Turkey may find its regional ambitions harder to realise if there is a change of attitude towards alliance unity from a new administration in Washington.
Rodger Shanahan