The Bangladesh government is viewing the recent border incidents in light of its efforts to rally the international community on repatriations. The Tatmadaw’s actions appear to be aimed at provoking a response from Bangladesh. An unstable border and conflict in Rakhine State would prove excellent justification to halt planned repatriations and provide cover for further refugee departures from Myanmar.
So far, the Bangladesh government’s response has been confined to calling for restraint, with an official commenting, “Our Prime Minister never wants war, we want a peaceful solution.” But hard questions remain. Should the Bangladesh Army reinforce its border positions to deter attacks, or should it allow further incursions by the Tatmadaw to avoid escalation? Should Bangladesh proceed with its repatriation plan, which could potentially involve sending refugees into a conflict zone?
These developments also place other regional players in difficult positions. Many Western countries, including Australia, have provided considerable humanitarian assistance to support Rohingyas in Bangladesh. A long-term solution needs to be found, but there are real concerns about a repatriation program – voluntary or not – to Myanmar.
Any lasting regional solution should involve India. It has significant stakes in the stability of Bangladesh and in ensuring that China is not given an opportunity to further enhance its influence there or in Myanmar. India’s treatment of the large number of Rohingya refugees that have settled within India has also become a significant political issue.
In the last few years, China has sought to act as a regional peacemaker, including through facilitating the repatriation of Rohingyas. But this has been undermined by recent events. It seems Beijing has not been able to rein in its partners in the Myanmar government or among Rakhine nationalist groups.
One thing that is clear is that the fate of the Rohingyas and peace along the Bangladesh–Myanmar border can’t just be treated as a bilateral issue. Any lasting solution will require a major regional effort. Australia too has significant equities in this problem and could potentially play an important role in working with partners to help broker a political solution.
Ultimately, repatriation will not be a realistic solution – whatever the nature of the regime that rules Myanmar. Nor is keeping nearly a million people dependent on humanitarian aid. Other solutions will need to be explored. This could include a concerted regional effort to economically develop Bangladesh’s relatively poor southern region, for the benefit of all concerned. Sheikh Hasina may see the opportunity to turn a seemingly intractable humanitarian problem into an economic success story.