Pacific Islands, explained.
A raggiana bird-of-paradise, Paradisaea raggiana, endemic to New Guinea, in fantastic display to attract a female (Getty Images Plus)
One of ancient roots, contemporary challenges and enduring spirit.
Subscribe to The Informer for monthly expert analysis, and to Events for advance notice of visiting world leaders and distinguished guests.
You may unsubscribe from Lowy Institute newsletters at any time. For information on our privacy practices and how to unsubscribe, see our Privacy Policy.
At 50, Papua New Guinea deserves a more complete storyAt 50, Papua New Guinea deserves a more complete story
Weak governance, persistent law-and-order challenges, poor human development outcomes, mismanaged natural resources, and a growing struggle to meet the needs of a young and rapidly expanding population – these remain familiar themes in stories about Papua New Guinea as the country approaches the 50th anniversary of independence in September. They are serious and pressing concerns, causing real hardship for many Papua New Guineans. Yet such narratives rarely appear alongside an appreciation of the country’s great strengths. Over more than three decades of professional involvement with PNG, I have witnessed first-hand its extraordinary natural beauty and biodiversity, its deep history, and the cultural richness and resilience of its people – strengths that deserve equal place in the nation’s story at fifty.
Twenty-million years ago, the Australian plate moving northward collided with the Pacific plate with enormous, slow force, concertinaing the seabed to raise the central cordillera of New Guinea. The resulting mountainous land and island arcs of rugged topography gave rise to extraordinary biodiversity and eventually shaped an astonishing diversity of human societies. The violent nature of its geological genesis left New Guinea with many volcanoes and seismic instability – hazards that persist today – and endowed it with abundant mineral reserves that have proved both a blessing and a curse.
Papua New Guinea remains a young nation, one with the opportunity to combine the advantages of modernity with the resilience and wisdom of its ancient traditions.
Around 50,000 years ago, some of the first modern humans to leave Africa traversed the vastness of Asia, crossed the Sunda Peninsula and island-hopped through Wallacea – now Malaysia and Indonesia respectively – before reaching the supercontinent of Sahul. At that time, lower sea levels had joined present-day New Guinea, Australia, and Tasmania into a single landmass spanning 11 million square kilometres. On their journey, they passed through lands already inhabited by other hominin species, and through their interaction with one group, the Denisovans, acquired genes that enhanced their survival in the challenging new environment.
In Sahul, these settlers encountered Pleistocene megafauna: Thylacoleo, the marsupial lion; Megalania, a giant relative of the Komodo dragon; and Quinkana, a fast-running terrestrial crocodile with serrated ziphodont teeth. Some of the early migrants moved north to settle New Guinea, while others travelled south to populate Australia. Around 10,000 years ago, as glaciers melted and sea levels rose, the Arafura Plain was submerged, separating the landmass and transforming New Guinea into the world’s largest tropical island. Today, the Indigenous peoples of New Guinea and Australia represent the world’s longest continuously settled cultures outside Africa.
Over the following millennia, the people of New Guinea diversified their livelihoods – from fishing and coastal foraging to hunting and gathering across the island’s vast forests. Some retained the seafaring skills used to reach Sahul, and by 45,000 years ago had crossed the northern waters to the large islands of the Bismarck Archipelago. By 20,000 years ago, they had reached Manus Island – a journey of more than 200 kilometres, then the longest known sea crossing undertaken by humans anywhere in the world.
In time, some communities began managing key food trees such as sago, pandanus, and Canarium. By 10,000 years ago, New Guinea had emerged as one of the world’s first independent centres of agriculture, with people cultivating taro, yam, banana, and sugarcane in the fertile valleys of the central highlands. This early farming system supported further expansion through New Guinea’s central cordillera – a mountain chain stretching 2,000 kilometres across the island, with peaks exceeding 4,500 metres. The dispersal of small groups over thousands of years across this rugged terrain may have led to the development of New Guinea’s largest language group, the Trans-New Guinea family, which comprises around 500 languages and ranks as the world’s third-largest language family.
Kimbe, West New Britain, Papua New Guinea (Asian Development Bank)
The next major chapter in the island’s human history was the arrival of the Austronesians, waves of maritime peoples from Southeast Asia who began settling along the north coast and nearby islands around 3,000 to 4,000 years ago, before continuing eastward to populate the remote Pacific. These newcomers integrated with local populations, introducing cultural innovations in governance, agriculture, dance and Lapita pottery. But their most transformative contribution was a mastery of seafaring. Their ocean-going double-hulled catamarans, outrigger canoes, and distinctive crab-claw sails, would have dramatically increased connectivity and trade among the communities of northern New Guinea and its surrounding island groups.
New Guinea’s geographic isolation from the major centres of Eurasia and its absence of centralised kingdoms or empires prior to European colonisation in the late 19th century, meant its populations remained largely dispersed and locally governed. Over 50,000 years, this fostered phenomenal linguistic and cultural diversity. Papua New Guinea is the most linguistically diverse country on Earth, home to around 850 distinct languages spread across 20 to 30 separate language families, along with numerous isolates. The entire island of New Guinea – accounting for just 0.5% of the world’s land area and 0.2% of its population – contains approximately 1,000 languages, representing around 14% of the world’s surviving languages.
Despite tens of thousands of years of human habitation, Indigenous livelihoods and small, diffuse populations left a relatively light ecological footprint on New Guinea’s natural environment. While there is evidence that overhunting by early settlers contributed to the extinction of the island’s megafauna, this remains contested, with Late Pleistocene climate change likely playing at least an equal role.
Today, the region retains a remarkable natural heritage of terrestrial and marine ecosystems and is home to around 7% of the world’s total biodiversity. It supports more than 20,000 plant species and hundreds of thousands of insect species. Its rich vertebrate fauna includes around 200 mammals – among them monotremes, marsupials, and placentals – as well as 800 bird species, 300 reptiles, and 200 amphibians. As part of the Coral Triangle, it harbours the highest level of marine biodiversity on Earth.
Despite decades of extraction by foreign logging companies and the growing threat of oil palm expansion, New Guinea still holds the largest expanse of tropical rainforest outside the Amazon and Congo basins. These forests form a vast natural carbon sink, critically important in an era of accelerating climate change.
New Guinea’s birds of paradise offer an iconic example of the island’s astonishing biological richness. Thirty-nine species across 15 genera are found nowhere else on Earth. Isolated for millions of years in remote upland rainforests, these birds underwent a spectacular evolutionary radiation driven by intense sexual selection, resulting in their exquisite colours, elaborate plumage, distinctive vocalisations, and extraordinary courtship displays.
The people of New Guinea have coexisted with these birds for millennia, weaving them into belief systems, rituals, and material culture. But when their skins were first brought to Europe in the early 16th century by the crew of Magellan’s circumnavigation, they caused a sensation. The birds were likened to the Phoenix or “birds of the sun”, appearing almost mythical to European eyes. The first European scientist to witness one in the wild, in the early 19th century, recorded the moment in awe:
“The view of the first bird of paradise was overwhelming. The gun remained idle in my hand for I was too astonished to shoot… a Paradisaea suddenly flew in graceful curves over my head. It was like a meteor whose body, cutting through the air, leaves a long trail of light.”
Later, the birds narrowly survived the devastation of the European millinery trade. At its peak in the early 20th century, some 80,000 skins were exported annually from New Guinea, before regulation and changes in fashion led to the collapse of the trade. Today, the much-loved kumul or Raggiana bird of paradise is Papua New Guinea’s national emblem, and the Paradisaeidae family remains the jewel in the crown of the country’s biological treasures. Yet they now face a greater threat: the accelerating loss of their rainforest habitat. Their survival is inseparable from the fate of New Guinea’s remaining forests.
Eastern Highlands Province, Papua New Guinea (Vika Chartier/Unsplash)
Alongside its unparalleled linguistic diversity, the long and largely undisturbed tenure of New Guinea by small-scale local societies fostered an extraordinary proliferation of cultural forms. When European outsiders finally reached the interior, they encountered a rich mosaic of social, political, and religious practices, and a dazzling array of artistic traditions – from body adornment and dance to masquerade and intricate carving. These expressions quickly drew the attention of scholars interested in the origins and development of human societies.
By the early 20th century, it had become almost obligatory for any serious student of anthropology to spend time in New Guinea. The British–Polish ethnographer Bronisław Malinowski famously developed the method of participant observation while living among the Trobriand Islanders, where he documented the remarkable oceanic trade cycles known as kula. The islanders taught him about the complexity and significance of this central institution of the Massim Archipelago, underpinned by rich mythologies not unlike those surrounding the voyages of Jason and Odysseus in ancient Greece.
Malinowski’s work influenced French social scientist Marcel Mauss, whose theory of the gift economy drew heavily on observations from New Guinea. Unlike market-based systems, the gift economy centres on the creation of social relationships and reciprocal obligations, rather than the accumulation of wealth.
New Guinea’s cultural richness also allowed American anthropologist Margaret Mead to explore the relationship between sex, personality, and traditional gender roles. Learning from three Sepik societies, the Arapesh, Biwat and Chambri, she reported that gender roles are culturally constructed rather than biologically fixed. Her writings challenged Western assumptions about gender and helped to shape later feminist thought, influencing the women’s rights movements of the 20th century.
The island’s unparalleled social diversity has continued to inspire and shape anthropological theory through the work of scholars such as Gregory Bateson, Marilyn and Andrew Strathern, and many others – each drawing on New Guinea to deepen our understanding of human nature, culture, and society.
The rapid influx of traders, missionaries, and new goods and ideas destabilised traditional societies.
For nearly 50 millennia, the peoples of New Guinea lived in relative isolation, punctuated only by the arrival of Austronesian seafarers along the north coast. While trade networks with Southeast Asia had existed for centuries, the 16th century brought a new kind of contact with the arrival of Portuguese and Spanish navigators during Europe’s so-called Age of Discovery. These early expeditions, including those led by Jorge de Meneses, Yñigo Ortiz de Retez, and Luís Vaz de Torres, sought sea routes between the East Indies and the Americas.
Dutch explorers of the Vereenigde Oostindische Compagnie, or the Dutch East India Company, most notably Abel Tasman, followed in the 17th century. Yet their impact was minimal: they mapped sections of the coastline, named the island “New Guinea” for its perceived resemblance to West Africa, and referred to its inhabitants as “Papuans” – after the Malay term papuwah, meaning curly haired. But they made no lasting incursion into the interior. The island’s rugged terrain, endemic malaria, and the determined self-defence of its people served as strong deterrents.
Even when Captain James Cook visited southwestern New Guinea in the late 18th century on his return from claiming New South Wales for the British Crown, his landing party – which included the naturalist Joseph Banks – was firmly repelled by a group of local Asmat warriors.
By the end of the 19th century, the situation had changed dramatically. Despite the objections of humanists such as the Russian scientist Nikolai Miklouho-Maclay, New Guinea succumbed to partition during the European scramble for colonies. The Dutch annexed the western half of the island, while the Germans claimed the northeast. The British took control of the southeast, later transferring administration to Australia. The island of New Guinea was thus divided into three colonial territories.
In the German territory, the Neuguinea-Kompagnie, a chartered company, sought to turn a profit by alienating customary land and forcing local people to labour under harsh conditions on copra, rubber, and cotton plantations. The company’s ambitions ultimately failed, and by the start of the First World War, its holdings had been absorbed into the German colonial administration. Within months of the war’s outbreak, Australian forces expelled the Germans, and after the war, the Territory of New Guinea passed to Australian control under a League of Nations mandate. However, rather than reforming the exploitative plantation economy established under German rule, the Australians chose to continue and expand it.
In the southern Territory of Papua, administered separately by Australia, the paternalistic approach under Sir Hubert Murray was intended to be protective. Yet even there, the rapid influx of traders, missionaries, and new goods and ideas destabilised traditional societies. One early sign of this disruption was the emergence of New Guinea’s first documented cargo cult – the Vailala Madness – a powerful response to cultural upheaval and the disorienting effects of the foreign administration.
Early colonial activity in New Guinea focused largely on coastal and island areas, and it was not until the 1930s that outsiders penetrated the vast intermontane valleys of the central highlands. In the east, Australian gold prospectors Mick and Dan Leahy, accompanied by patrol officer Jim Taylor and local guides reached the Asaro and Wahgi valleys – encountering large, agriculturally sophisticated populations. In the west, aerial reconnaissance by the American biologist Richard Archbold revealed the expansive Baliem Valley, home to dense populations of Dani people.
The entire island of New Guinea – accounting for just 0.5% of the world’s land area and 0.2% of its population – contains approximately 14% of the world’s surviving languages.
Isolated for thousands of years in these high, fertile plateaux, the peoples of the highlands had maintained traditional lifestyles and complex social systems with little direct external influence. Yet they were not entirely cut off. Long-distance trade routes had connected them to coastal communities, enabling the arrival of important crops such as the sweet potato, which had reached the highlands centuries earlier.
The discovery of such large inland populations came as a surprise to colonial authorities. The dramatic moments of “first contact” – including photographs, film footage, and journal accounts – made headlines around the world.
In 1942, New Guinea was invaded by Japanese forces and became a major theatre of the Second World War, with significant battles fought in and around its larger coastal towns. Many local people were drawn into the conflict as labourers, scouts, soldiers, or affected civilians. The experience left deep and lasting change across the region.
After the war, the global tide turned toward decolonisation. In 1949, the Australian government merged its two eastern jurisdictions to create the unified Territory of Papua and New Guinea. Australian patrol officers or kiaps continued to contact remote communities and assert administrative control, while missionaries – alongside proselytising – provided the first health and education services in many areas.
Under growing international pressure in the 1960s, Australia began preparing Papua New Guinea for independence. But the timeline was short, and the adoption of a centralised Westminster-style parliamentary system proved ill-suited to the country’s traditional bigman leadership structures and its extraordinary regional and cultural diversity. At the same time efforts to localise political leadership and build the administrative capacity for independence were insufficient.
A local House of Assembly was established in 1964, followed by formal self-government in 1972. Full independence was achieved on 16 September 1975 – bringing us to this year’s 50th anniversary.
In his historic address at the first independence ceremony, incoming Prime Minister Michael Somare declared:
“I wish to remind all that this is just the beginning. Now we must stand on our own two feet and work harder than ever before. We are indeed masters of our own destiny.”
Photos from the 1975 independence celebrations, including Sir Michael Somare meeting with Australia's Gough Whitlam (National Archives Australia)
Yet the first Indigenous national government faced immediate and formidable challenges. The country’s infrastructure was underdeveloped; most rural communities had little or no access to health and education services; and the public service remained small, staffed largely by expatriates from the former colonial administration. The economy was fragile and undiversified. The population was highly fragmented, divided among hundreds of tribal and linguistic groups. Intertribal tensions – particularly in the highlands – remained widespread, and secessionist movements threatened national unity in several regions, most notably on Bougainville.
These challenges are epitomised by the large resource development projects introduced both before and after independence, intended to generate jobs and much-needed revenue to support national development, but which, in many cases, have ended badly.
In the Trans-Gogol region of Madang, the Japanese and New Guinea Timber Company (JANT) established what was then the largest forestry operation in the southern hemisphere. Over several decades, it clear-felled tens of thousands of hectares of ancient rainforest. Despite the scale of extraction, local communities saw little benefit and are now left with a legacy of environmental and social harm.
The Rio Tinto Panguna copper and gold mine in central Bougainville, once among the largest in the world, became a major catalyst for the 10-year civil war that left an estimated 15,000 to 20,000 people dead and created a legacy of trauma, displacement, and distrust that remains unresolved.
The BHP Ok Tedi mine in remote Western Province, another globally significant project, contributed at one point up to 10% of PNG’s GDP. But the failure to complete construction of a tailings dam led to environmental destruction of similar global significance. A thousand kilometres of Papua New Guinea’s largest river system the Fly River and adjoining floodplains were polluted by sedimentation and heavy metals, devastating aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems and destroying the livelihoods of tens of thousands of people.
Some of these outcomes can be attributed to weak governance, but this was compounded by the unscrupulous practices of the companies involved. Even where outright exploitation was not the case, Papua New Guinea has displayed many of the symptoms of what is commonly called the resource curse. This phenomenon disproportionately affects developing countries that lack the robust institutions, regulatory capacity, and fiscal systems needed to manage and distribute the concentrated wealth generated by extractive industries.
The result is often economic distortion, weakened public accountability, increased corruption, and, in some cases, social unrest and conflict. Today Papua New Guinea continues to rely heavily on the extraction of its natural resources. Yet despite a resource boom in the early 2010s, resource wealth has too often failed to translate into broad-based development or meaningful improvements in essential services – particularly in rural areas where 85% of the population lives.
Tubusereia fishing village, Central Province, PNG (Asian Development Bank)
I first went to Papua New Guinea as a volunteer teacher in the early 1990s. I went on to spend 15 years living in the country, working in the health and education sectors. Now, more than three decades later, my professional involvement continues.
Over the years, I have been fortunate to visit many rural areas – by four-wheel drive, dinghy, canoe, or light aircraft, and often on foot. Across high ranges, out to volcanic islands, through river systems and inland forests, and along palm-fringed coastlines. Of course, there were many difficulties, and at times, security challenges. Yet almost without exception, I was met with warmth and hospitality by local villagers, though I often wondered what I could contribute in return.
I often saw strong local cohesion and met capable, effective village leaders. But such grassroots strengths rarely translated to provincial or national levels, where disunity and weak institutions were more apparent. Despite this, many people were working hard to overcome the difficulties and achieve meaningful outcomes. I found it most effective to identify those strengths – and try to build on them.
As Papua New Guinea approaches the 50th anniversary of its independence, it is important to reflect honestly on the significant challenges it continues to face. Yet it is equally important to recognise the country’s enduring strengths and the promise it holds. Against the backdrop of its deep human history, Papua New Guinea remains a young nation, one with the opportunity to combine the advantages of modernity with the resilience and wisdom of its ancient traditions.
In the mid-1990s, I had the privilege of meeting the late Bernard Narokobi, Papua New Guinean jurist, parliamentarian and poet, who played a key role in the drafting of the country’s Constitution. He was a modest, gentle man, and a deep thinker. His book, The Melanesian Way, gave voice to Papua New Guinean cultural pride at a pivotal moment in the development of the new nation.
Narokobi consistently argued that Papua New Guinea must chart its own development path, grounded in its own values and worldview. He believed that its people should not aspire to become Europeans, Australians, or Asians – but to be Papua New Guineans.
The journey ahead will not be easy, but Papua New Guinea has everything it needs – within its people, its culture, and its land – to shape a future worthy of its extraordinary past.
About the author
Peter Raynes
Peter Raynes has worked for more than 30 years in the Pacific region, living in a range of countries from Indonesia and Timor-Leste to Kiribati and Vanuatu, and with most extensive professional experience in Papua New Guinea.
The most-pressing world events explained by Lowy Institute experts and global contributors, in your inbox, every Thursday.
You may unsubscribe from The Interpreter at any time. For information on our privacy practices and how to unsubscribe, see our Privacy Policy.
