An international treaty would also recognise the permanency of maritime borders. Currently, these are defined as distance from the low-water line along the coastline – straightforward for continental countries. In archipelagic states, these are measured from the outermost islands and reefs. However, as sea levels rise, islands will disappear. They already are.
In Solomon Islands, five uninhabited islands (Kale, Kakatina, Rapita, Rehana, and Zollies) have completely disappeared. The island of Nuatambu lost more than half its inhabitable area between 2011 and 2016, and Taro, Choiseul Province’s capital, may need to relocate soon, given its elevation of only 2 metres. Kiribati even lost two islands, Abanuea and Tebua Tarawa, back in 1999.
If low-lying outer islands disappear, this could potentially redefine maritime borders – or lead to international disputes over them. Maritime boundaries delineate where states can exercise exclusive control, including preventing illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing, extracting resources, and managing conservation and natural resources. An international treaty that recognises the permanency of maritime boundaries would ensure states have a legal basis to protect their maritime waters from foreign exploitation should outer islands disappear.
In an ideal world, the international community ensures that pre-existing agreements to halt sea level rise are met. However, that is not the current reality. Tuvalu’s call this month to adopt an international treaty on sea level rise is a dire one. It’s an acknowledgement that we may not be able to act in time to save Tuvalu, but we can take proactive steps to protect those most vulnerable in the worst-case scenario. Australia and Tuvalu have already pioneered the Falepili Union bilaterally. It’s time to look at taking it international.