Testimony therapy was even employed with victims of the notorious “Killing Fields”, where survivors revisited their Khmer Rouge memories amid mass graves. The ceremony began with a Stupa ritual. Kneeling before monks, participants prayed, burned incense, received blessings, and listened to testimonies. Following the emotional experience at the Killing Fields, a sense of tranquillity embraced the pagoda. Survivors prayed before a Buddha statue, and counsellors summarised testimonies before reading them. Monks purified documents, tied threads, and blessed survivors. The ceremony concluded with monks’ blessings and the sprinkling of holy water, implanting a sense of purification.
Simultaneously, the tribunal facilitated Dhammayietra, a form of monk-led walking meditation, wherein survivors walk together to sacred sites and find solace in shared trauma while chanting in the sacred languages of Pali and Sanskrit alongside Khmer. The concept of addressing the past through testimonial therapy is shown by the Ksem Ksan Association, a Buddhist civil society group. At S-21, a former torture chamber, Chum Mey, a Buddhist Monk and one of the few survivors of the facility, stated:
We held a Buddhist ceremony in S-21, and the idea of having a ceremony there was to dedicate to those who died in S-21. We would like the dead people to know that we are going to seek justice for them.
The ECCC is likely the first international court to direct such practices as legitimate remedies under international law, representing an attempt to not only to hold individuals criminally responsible but also to restore the dignity of victims. While only a few civil parties were awarded testimonial therapy, they were well received, highlighting the value of further use in future healing processes with affected communities in post-conflict societies.
Beyond the reparation’s legal framework, the ECCC led outreach projects with Buddhist monasteries and community organisations. The tribunal’s Deputy Director Knut Rosandhaug addressed a congregation of 400 monks, noting that “being respected monks, through this special and privileged standing in this society, can complement the court proceedings by assisting victims and perpetrators to reconcile”.
Similarly, the tribunal supported visits from Buddhist congregations from Japan, Thailand and Myanmar with their Cambodian counterparts, collectively praying for cultural rejuvenation and universal peace. During breaks in trials, Buddhist congregations organised ornate blessing ceremonies in the courtroom. They erected a large statue of a revered spirit in Cambodian Buddhism, offering a comforting space for victims to take an oath before facing the accused.
Now in its residual phase, mandating functions such as ongoing enforcement of reparations and “information dissemination”, the ECCC has a unique opportunity to positively disrupt the over-representation of Eurocentric trends in international law. The experience with the ECCC blurs the conventional role of the international tribunal by leading victim-centred projects, extending beyond solely zero-sum criminal litigation. Termed a “networked mechanism”, it explores the potential of localised justice through Buddhist-inspired approaches, opening discussions about the tribunal’s unique status being physically located at the crime site, along with the often overlooked role of religion in community healing.
The court stands as an experiment in transitional justice, highlighted by convicting Khieu Samphan, history’s first head of state for genocide. Despite obstacles such as allegations of political interference, limited personal jurisdiction and financial burdens, the ECCC’s approach shows how faith-based interventions and criminal prosecutions can innovatively meet, fostering healing in the aftermath of mass atrocities.
The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not reflect the views or positions of any institutions they represent.