Upon request, the NSW, QLD and SA state Departments of Education all confirmed their syllabi do not specify which maps to use. The current Australian curriculum for geography does not mention the Pacific, and only once under Asia-Pacific history (Opens in new window) (as an optional elaboration on Polynesian expansion across the Pacific). Education about Oceania is widely seen as optional.
Most countries divide geographical education into three categories: domestic, regional, and global. French classrooms display maps of France, Europe, and the world. Classrooms in Panama have maps showing Panama, Central America, and the world. Yet in Australia, maps rarely feature the wider region.
As Togo’s Foreign Minister Robert Dussey said, “Maps shape our understanding of the world. They guide education, nourish the imagination, and influence collective perceptions.” If Australians do not think often of their Pacific neighbours, how can they be an active member of the region?
Australia must integrate regionally accurate maps of Australia and the Pacific across the education system. To be a more engaged member of the Pacific community, it must start with education and awareness from a young age. Diplomatic visits, kava ceremonies and promises of renewable transition – all the while refusing to phase out fossil fuels – are not enough to nourish Australia’s relationship with the Pacific. Talk of being part of a “Pacific Family” means nothing if children don’t know their Pacific cousins exist.
Togo argued that for Africa to be adequately seen, it must be adequately represented. The same applies to the Pacific being seen on the world stage. If Australia wants influence and credibility, and to commit seriously to being a genuine member of the region, this must start with education.