The indirect impacts of climate disasters on mental health are similarly widespread. Cyclones invariably bring increases in gender-based violence and with them the associated mental health harms. Flooding blocks access to health services as well as education, compounding existing disadvantage and disempowerment.
Slow-onset climate-change-driven stressors are less violent but no less destructive. Prolonged droughts are associated with heightened anxiety, depression and suicide, underpinned by food and financial insecurity. Melting sea ice depletes traditional hunting territories causing, among other things, loss of connection to culture and solastalgia (grief associated with negative environmental changes). That same melted ice contributes to sea level rise, which raises soil salinity in low-lying agricultural regions. High salinity renders the land inarable, once again driving food insecurity and subsequent anxiety and psychological distress.
The Pacific’s mental health workforce falls considerably short of being able to absorb the increased burden driven by climate change. Four Pacific Island nations have an effective ratio of zero psychiatrists per 100,000 people, compared to Australia at 16 per 100,000. Only one nation of the ten for which data are available has more than two psychiatrists tasked with servicing every 100,000 people (Palau: 11 per 100,000). Although issues related to mortality reporting are significant in the Pacific, the data that does exist indicates the Oceanic region has the highest proportion of deaths by suicide in the world.
Compounding healthcare inadequacies is a shift in aid distribution stemming from mounting geopolitical competitiveness. Between 2009 and 2023, development spending on strategic infrastructure in the Pacific grew from US$97 million to US$484 million per annum. Across the same timeframe, health spending dropped from US$290 million to US$256 million, per the Lowy Institute Pacific Aid Map.
Enabling access to quality mental healthcare is key to the continued development of climate resilience in the Pacific region. Most Pacific Island nations have limited capacity for in-country tertiary education, and the opportunity for specialty mental health training is similarly limited in thosecountries that do have a medical school(there are six schools in total across five Pacific nations). Increasing the capacity for domestic training is a worthwhile long-term undertaking. Schemes facilitating training of Pacific Islanders in nearby Australia and New Zealand, such as the Australia Awards Scholarship, provide a more immediate pathway for expanding the Pacific mental health workforce. However, ensuring these internationally trained mental health professionals return to the Pacific post-training, rather than furthering Pacific “Brain Drain”, requires additional domestic incentives, including competitive remuneration, sound infrastructure, and adequate resourcing to deliver quality mental healthcare.
Ensuring quality mental healthcare in the Pacific requires a deep understanding of the unique cultural context. For example, establishing vā, (a sacred Pacific concept referring to the relational space binding and unifying all things), is an important early step in healthcare engagement for many Pacific peoples. Mental health workforce expansion, and approaches to prevention and treatment must be grounded in Pacific principles; investment in local mental health professionals is therefore essential to building genuine climate resilience in the Pacific.