Subscribe to The Informer for monthly expert analysis, and to Events for advance notice of visiting world leaders and distinguished guests.
You may unsubscribe from Lowy Institute newsletters at any time. For information on our privacy practices and how to unsubscribe, see our Privacy Policy.
The most-pressing world events explained by Lowy Institute experts and global contributors, in your inbox, every Thursday.
You may unsubscribe from The Interpreter at any time. For information on our privacy practices and how to unsubscribe, see our Privacy Policy.
What the new defence white paper will say about ChinaWhat the new defence white paper will say about China
John Kerin's interview with Defence Minister Senator David Johnston in today's Financial Review is worth quoting at length:
Senator Johnston signalled there would be no going back to the central tenet of Kevin Rudd’s 2009 defence white paper, which was predicated on the potential for Australia to be involved in a war in North Asia...
...“We [the Coalition] obviously prefer a balanced approach [to the US and China], [Foreign Minister] Julie Bishop and I are both from Western Australia where our relationship with China is strong, very professional and very commercial,’’ Senator Johnston said. “We don’t subscribe to the concept that you must choose between the US and China,” Senator Johnston said. “We see that there is a balance between our relationship with China and sustaining our strong alliance with the United States...
...Senator Johnston said he subscribed to a similar view as recent former US ambassador to Australia Jeffrey Bleich, who suggested the economic interdependency of the US and China mitigated against the two countries heading towards some sort of “doomsday scenario’’...Before his departure from Australia, Mr Bleich said he believed the US was more afraid of China failing than succeeding and that Beijing felt the same about Washington. “I think he’s spot on,’’ Senator Johnston said.
For all the reasons laid out in the Lind & Press article I flagged earlier today, this strikes me as naive. US-China relations are not fated to be peaceful and mutually beneficial. But Senator Johnston's remarks can be interpreted in other ways: [fold]
No. 3 is too cynical for me, and no. 2 too unambitious for a Coalition government. So I tend to favour no.1. The Coalition has grasped at a benign analysis of regional security dynamics because if came to less benign conclusions, it would have to find money to cope with it.
That's pure conjecture, but if it's true, its more or less the opposite of what wonks aim for when they talk about 'evidence-based policy', in which evidence is collected and assessed first, and the policy follows.
Photo by Flickr user lee.s.sun.
Sam Roggeveen
About the author
Sam Roggeveen
Sam Roggeveen is Program Director of the Lowy Institute’s International Security Program. He is the author of The Echidna Strategy: Australia's Search for Power and Peace (Opens in new window), published by La Trobe University Press in 2023.