Australia, explained.
An aerial view of a fountain in a park shaped as the African continent (Etienne Swanepoel/Unsplash)
Maritime security, critical minerals and digital resilience connect East Africa directly to Australian interests.
Subscribe to The Informer for monthly expert analysis, and to Events for advance notice of visiting world leaders and distinguished guests.
You may unsubscribe from Lowy Institute newsletters at any time. For information on our privacy practices and how to unsubscribe, see our Privacy Policy.
Why Australia should look west … to East AfricaWhy Australia should look west … to East Africa
East Africa sits at the crossroads of the Indian Ocean. Its ports, sea lanes, undersea data cables, mineral corridors and youthful population connect Asia, the Middle East and Africa in ways that matter directly to Australian interests. From Mombasa and Dar es Salaam to Djibouti, the region is no longer peripheral. It is a working part of the global system that keeps supply chains moving, data flowing and energy markets stable.
As a trading nation dependent on open sea lanes and reliable partners, Australia has strong reasons to look beyond familiar Asian theatres. East Africa offers exactly that, not a competitor to Southeast Asia or India, but a complementary partner in a wider Indo-Pacific.
Japan has already grasped this reality. Through decades of engagement in Africa, and especially via its long-running Africa development framework, Tokyo has quietly built credibility as a reliable partner focused on quality infrastructure, industrial cooperation and long-term development rather than quick wins. Japan’s emphasis on transparency, skills and durable investment resonates strongly with African governments seeking growth that lasts.
Australia, by contrast, has historically played a more modest role in Africa. This is changing. Recent defence and development strategies show Canberra increasingly thinking about the Indo-Pacific not as a fixed map, but as a set of functional connections. Maritime security in the Indian Ocean, digital infrastructure resilience and access to critical minerals all point west as much as north.
Looking westward to East Africa is not a distraction from Asia. It is part of the same strategic picture.
The real opportunity lies in what Australia and Japan can achieve together. The two countries bring different strengths that fit neatly. Japan excels at the “hardware” of development: long-term finance, industrial technology, engineering and infrastructure delivery. Australia can provide the “software” comprising governance reform, environmental regulation, geospatial systems, mineral governance and experience adapting complex systems to difficult operating environments. East African governments have repeatedly made the same point: infrastructure only works when these two elements are combined.
East Africa holds significant reserves of critical minerals including graphite, titanium, niobium and emerging rare earth prospects. Japan is actively seeking alternatives to highly concentrated mineral supply chains. Australia has deep expertise in transparent mining governance, environmental standards and community engagement. Together, the two countries could support mineral development that is commercially viable, environmentally responsible and politically durable, while helping diversify global supply chains.
Maritime security and the blue economy are also essential. Africa’s ports are critical to global logistics, fisheries and energy flows. Japan has decades of experience in port development and fisheries support. Australia can contribute maritime governance, surveillance and environmental science. Joint engagement would strengthen coastal resilience, protect marine ecosystems and support regional stability in ways that benefit everyone who relies on Indian Ocean trade routes.
Digital infrastructure is another quiet but vital piece of the puzzle. Africa is threaded together by undersea fibre-optic cables that carry data between continents. When those cables fail, economies grind to a halt. Japan’s engineering capacity and Australia’s experience in digital governance and spatial data systems offer a practical way to strengthen resilience in systems that underpin everything from banking to border control.
None of this requires grand new institutions or expensive headline initiatives. The smartest approach is to work through existing platforms, align what already exists and focus on a small number of high-impact projects. Regional bodies in East Africa, multilateral development banks and established Indo-Pacific cooperation mechanisms already provide the scaffolding.
This does not require choosing sides in a great-power contest. East African countries overwhelmingly prefer diversified partnerships. A pragmatic Australia–Japan approach would complement existing actors, including India, and where appropriate coordinate on technical standards rather than frame engagement as competition.
There are risks, of course. Budgets are finite. Institutional capacity varies. Political transitions and global shocks can disrupt the best-laid plans. These are arguments for careful, patient engagement--not disengagement.
The logic is clear. Australia’s economy is deeply tied to Indian Ocean trade, critical minerals and maritime stability. Looking westward to East Africa is not a distraction from Asia. It is part of the same strategic picture. As the Indo-Pacific continues to expand in practice, if not in name, Australia would do well to ensure that East Africa is part of the conversation and that we approach it alongside partners who share our interest in quality, stability and long-term resilience.
About the author
Christopher Burke
Christopher Burke is a senior advisor at WMC Africa, a communications and advisory agency located in Kampala, Uganda.
The most-pressing world events explained by Lowy Institute experts and global contributors, in your inbox, every Thursday.
You may unsubscribe from The Interpreter at any time. For information on our privacy practices and how to unsubscribe, see our Privacy Policy.
