White papers are major undertakings and are – quite legitimately – often criticised as costly, slow and outdated by the time they’re published. It could be argued that policymakers should already be thinking strategically, internal classified assessments already inform government decision-making, and the rapid pace of global change makes long-term planning challenging. Yet the world has clearly changed in ways that demand Australia take stock and consider how it may continue to change in the years ahead.
A white paper provides the opportunity to think about Australia’s strategy from first principles. Strategy is not something Australia does well. There are fundamental differences between international engagement, the art of diplomacy, foreign policy, and strategy – yet Australia too often conflates them, or leaves it to Defence.
A white paper would also offer a crucial opportunity to think about how Australia navigates the world. In an increasingly contested and transactional ecosystem, where Australia wields less influence and struggles to protect its interests, how can Australia be more strategic, creative, and agile? How and where can it build influence? Where does Australia have – or can it create – leverage? The very volatility of the international environment presents opportunities – if Australia is prepared to seize them. Australia must also become far more sophisticated in how it frames its interests and positions, and competes in the global battle of ideas – whether with regional partners, global institutions, or even domestic audiences. Why does Australia matter, and why should others want to work with us?
Not doing this strategic thinking and planning will lead to miscalculations in foreign and security policy, missed opportunities, and diminished diplomatic leverage in the future – none of which Australia can afford.
Beyond strategy, white papers also serve an unsexy but important bureaucratic function. They provide the all-important policy authority that government functions on. A white paper – endorsed by Cabinet – would set overarching policy and enable updates to existing frameworks, remits, and institutional structures. It would also provide coherence between Australia’s defence strategy and the proliferation of other international engagement documents. Governments often talk about using all elements of national power to advance Australia’s interests – a white paper provides the mechanism to deliver on that.
It’s also an opportunity to ensure Australia’s foreign policy architecture is fit for purpose. Australia’s foreign policy and diplomatic structures were built for a world that no longer exists. DFAT is underfunded, understaffed and constrained by outdated arrangements. Are funding levels aligned with strategic realities? Does the internal culture truly value outside-the-box thinking? A white paper could take stock of these shortcomings and provide the policy levers for necessary reforms. This is no easy task. Australia cannot control global events but it can – and must – control how it prepares for them by ensuring its institutions and processes are fit and ready for the challenges ahead.
The next government – Labor or Coalition – will inherit a world more unstable than at any point in Australia’s modern history. The question is not whether we need a new foreign policy white paper – it’s why we haven’t already started drafting one.