The implications of the US absence became more serious when Trump said on the weekend that he would not accept anything beyond the chair’s statement. This means the G20 is now unlikely to reach a leaders’ declaration for the first time since its inception, which could undermine the very purpose of the summit and underscore the limitations of consensus-based models. The leaders’ declaration is the G20’s core output, reflecting agreement and serving as an action plan to address global economic and political issues. A chair’s statement, however, is a more informal outcome document issued by the host country's chair, and it may be released even without full consensus.
Ramaphosa has maintained that the absence of the United States at the summit will not derail the discussions. However, South Africa’s long-standing non-aligned foreign policy, traditionally a diplomatic asset, is becoming challenging to maintain in a fractured global order where major powers expect clearer alignments.
With the United States, China, and Russia absent, South Africa faces a difficult question as host: whether it has the political weight to moderate discussions and drive consensus within a forum whose effectiveness has historically relied on the participation of all major powers. The G20 is not only a diplomatic platform but also a negotiation space in which these states have traditionally shaped outcomes, set priorities, and anchored agreements among competing interests.
Trump’s absence at the summit is especially concerning, given the political and economic dominance of the United States on the global stage. This will also be the second consecutive year in which the US has been absent during important discussions. Under the Biden administration, officials were reluctant to commit to long-term initiatives, knowing they would likely be overturned once Trump took office. Trump’s disengagement also signals that many of the priorities advanced during the past four Global South presidencies, including the discussions that will take place in a few days, are unlikely to survive next year’s agenda under a US G20 presidency.
Despite Ramaphosa insisting that the summit will proceed without the US and that “their absence is their loss”, expectations will need to be adjusted. The summit will test whether South Africa can maintain momentum on its agenda and demonstrate that the G20 can still function as a meaningful forum, even as the global order becomes increasingly divided.