While the ECTA has opened numerous opportunities, several obstacles hinder the full realisation of these potential benefits. One major obstacle is the regulatory and infrastructural differences between the two countries. Harmonising standards and certifications, particularly in sectors such as agriculture and pharmaceuticals, poses significant challenges. This regulatory divergence often leads to delays and increased costs for businesses attempting to navigate both markets.
Technological advancements in digital economics, especially blockchain and digital payments, offer promising solutions to streamline trade between India and Australia. Digital payment systems such as Australia’s PayID and India’s Unified Payments Interface can reduce trade costs by as much as 16 per cent, according to a 2022 World Bank report. Digital payments can enhance trade efficiency by enabling seamless transactions and reducing reliance on traditional methods such as letters of credit. E-commerce platforms can connect businesses and consumers globally, opening new markets for both Australian and Indian goods.
Initiatives to facilitate digital commerce, such as the Asia-Pacific Commerce Agreement (APTA), promote electronic certificates of origin and digital trade papers, streamlining trade processes and reducing mistakes related to paper-based management. Blockchain technology, considered tamper-proof and secure, may facilitate the use of smart contracts to automate trade procedures, speed transactions, and cut costs. This will require overcoming the digital skills gap and investing in digital infrastructure between Australia and India. Again, harmonising regulations is essential for smooth integration and preventing interruptions to commerce.
The geopolitical landscape also influences these partnerships, with the global focus on the Indo-Pacific region creating an alignment for India and Australia as a counterweight to China. India's cautious stance towards regional trade agreements, exemplified by its exit from negotiations on the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) in 2019 due to concerns over China’s dominant role, reflects its apprehensions about entering agreements that might undermine its domestic industries. These geopolitical considerations, coupled with domestic economic policies, have also slowed down the pace of deeper economic integration with countries such as Australia.
Finally, instead of being overly concerned with trade deficits, India should focus on the nature of traded commodities and prioritise trade in intermediaries, especially manufacturing. As negotiations progress towards a more comprehensive trade and economic deal, attention should be given to underdeveloped sectors such as agriculture, education, tourism, and services, emphasising liberalising services and enhancing digital infrastructure. The ambition of both countries should be rich.