Indonesia’s diplomacy is purposeful. It is not reactive or trend-driven but adaptive. It continues to evolve as the world around it becomes increasingly complex. In a time when global politics is marked by growing competition and distrust, every change in tone or activism can easily be seen as inconsistency.
For a country navigating shifting power centres, remaining stagnant is not an option. Adaptability is no longer a luxury; it is a necessity.
Indonesia’s foreign policy has long been anchored in the idea of politik luar negeri bebas aktif, an independent and active diplomacy that values both sovereignty and engagement. What we see today is not a departure from that principle but its renewal, an effort to stay true to old ideals while adapting to a changing international environment.
The central tenet of Indonesia’s foreign policy remains the same: peace, equality, and sovereignty. The only thing that has changed is the context.
Not taking advantage of others, but adapting
Commentators, such as Virdika Rizky Utama writing in The Interpreter last month, view Indonesia’s increased participation in international groups such as BRICS and the OECD as opportunistic. In fact, it reflects strategic adaptation, not opportunism. It shows an awareness that the world no longer fixated on a single axis of power. Engaging with multiple frameworks does not mean choosing sides; it means keeping alternatives open and dialogue alive. In a time when cooperation is weak and marked with division, countries that build bridges rather than walls are the ones keeping diplomacy alive.
Jakarta’s active role in various arenas shows that it seeks to connect different worlds, the Global North and South, advanced and developing economies alike. This is not diplomacy based on convenience or short-term deals. It is about building relationships, finding common ground, and preserving space for dialogue when everything else appears uncertain.
Indonesia’s posture as a democratic middle power enables it to engage with all partners without losing its direction. Neutrality has never meant silence.
Maintaining positive ties with China, the United States, France, and other partners is not inconsistency; it is balance. Indonesia’s history and geography have always demanded such balance: being open to all but dependent on none. That flexibility has shielded the country from binding alliances, enabled it to speak for the developing world, and made ASEAN’s position genuinely relevant rather than merely symbolic.
Strong, but quiet
Megaphone diplomacy is not always a measure of leadership. Indonesia’s diplomats have long understood that quiet persistence can be more powerful than loud posturing.
Jakarta’s approach to issues such as the conflict in Gaza, recognition of the State of Palestine in the United Nations, Myanmar, or the South China Sea is rarely dramatic. It seldom opts for confrontation. Instead, it usually serves as a friendly host, bringing various parties together to keep things calm and civil, and not letting talks die even when others have given up.
President Prabowo Subianto’s recent travels, from Beijing and New York to Cairo, fit the same pattern. These trips are not designed to signal restlessness, but commitment. His focus on balanced independence and humanitarian priorities reflects the belief that morality and practicality are not adversaries but partners in pursuing peace.
Indonesia has worked on this balance of restraint and commitment for decades. Silence, in this context, carries power. This diplomacy does not seek to be praised but earns respect through steadiness, as it believes that enduring influence lasts longer than fleeting attention.
Continuity in action
Indonesia’s foreign policy remains grounded in strong institutions. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs continues to work closely with the presidency to ensure that long-term priorities align with daily action. Indeed, the tempo of diplomacy has altered, and therefore foreign policy communities and observers must keep up.
In a world where information travels instantly and reactions are immediate, being visible is now as important as what is being said. Adapting to that rhythm does not mean losing depth; it means being more deliberate and transparent about it.
This evolution does not make diplomacy more personal; rather, it reflects confidence. Indonesia’s posture as a democratic middle power enables it to engage with all partners without losing its direction. Neutrality has never meant silence—it means composure when others rush to take sides and consistency when the world around it grows impatient. Continuity and change are not contradictions; they strengthen one another.
Indonesia’s diplomatic style remains methodical, professional, and low-key—qualities that provide the stability needed to embrace change.
A steady compass when things are unclear
Indonesia charts its own course, guided by freedom, fairness, and a strong sense of duty. This narrative recounts a nation that endured colonial oppression, aided many nations in their struggles for freedom, and now, draws on that moral legacy to work for a more just world order.
As competition intensifies and trust declines, the most valuable diplomatic skills are not military power or eloquence, but the ability to listen, mediate, and connect. Not many countries understand and practice this as effectively as Indonesia. Its diplomacy is not about dominance and being at the top, but about being relevance by keeping communication open when many doors are closing.
Therefore, the true question is not where Indonesia stands, but what it stands for. The answer remains the same: peace, equality, and the conviction that diplomacy works best when it brings nations and people together rather than pulling them apart.
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author in his personal capacity and do not necessarily reflect the official position of the Government of Indonesia or any affiliated institution.
