Second, it is necessary to finalise and adopt relevant guidelines and documents to ensure the effective operation of the ACF. For instance, a concept paper on the ACF should be developed to clearly define its mandate, significance, scope, and the forms of its activities. Additionally, terms of reference should be issued to outline the responsibilities of its members, the decision-making processes, and the work plan for the ACF. These documents should also outline the protocols for engagement to guide the activities at sea of ASEAN states’ coast guards. To this end, the European Coast Guard Functions Forum (ECGFF) exemplifies effective cooperation among coast guards and may provide valuable insights for ACF.
The cooperation mechanisms of ACF should ensure transparency, open communications, and a mutual understanding of shared maritime security challenges. Real-time information sharing will enable its members to exchange maritime surveillance data and intelligence on common threats. Currently, ASEAN navies facilitate information exchange through the ASEAN Information-Sharing Portal; the ACF could develop a similar dedicated platform for Coast Guard agencies. Still, challenges such as varying national policies, data sensitivity, and the region's linguistic diversity may hinder effective information-sharing.
Capacity-building exercises should also remain a central focus of cooperation, where maritime law enforcement agencies could co-host joint drills, law enforcement exercises, specialised training, and knowledge exchange programs. Training programs can encompass areas such as search and rescue operations, cybersecurity, safety protocols, navigation techniques, and equipment training, among others. This, in turn, can strengthen a common understanding of maritime security challenges and promote inter-agency cooperation. Recently, the Philippines and Vietnam held the first-ever joint coast guard exercise. This could be scaled up to involve more coast guard agencies in the region through the umbrella of ACF.
Operationalising these recommendations is not easy. Southeast Asian coast guards continue to face constraints in resources, personnel, and funding, which can hinder their meaningful participation in regional engagements. Notwithstanding, the formalisation of ACF is essential for effectively suppressing maritime crimes, such as illicit trafficking and IUU fishing, which necessitates interstate cooperation in law enforcement. This initiative will empower the ACF to play a stronger role in advancing ASEAN's commitment to a comprehensive and integrated maritime security strategy.
This article is part of the “Blue Security” project led by La Trobe Asia, University of Western Australia Defence and Security Institute, Griffith Asia Institute, United States Studies Centre, UNSW Canberra and the Asia-Pacific Development, Diplomacy and Defence Dialogue (AP4D). Views expressed are solely of its authors.